<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ruah arts group &#187; Catholic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ruah.stblogs.com/tag/catholic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ruah.stblogs.com</link>
	<description>renewing the face of culture.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:15:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Gospel According to Dan Brown</title>
		<link>http://ruah.stblogs.com/2009/05/31/the-gospel-according-to-dan-brown/</link>
		<comments>http://ruah.stblogs.com/2009/05/31/the-gospel-according-to-dan-brown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 04:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ruah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Angels & Demons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apologetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daniel VanSlyke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Faith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology on Tap]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruah.stblogs.com/?p=219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He writes page turners to sell his &#8220;theology&#8221;. It&#8217;s not a big surprise to faithful and well-formed Christians&#8211;and in particular, Catholic Christians&#8211;but it seems to be news to the millions who read and love him into theological and historical delusion.
Read NY Times Op-Ed Columnist Ross Douthat here. He opens up the cancerous body of work [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" style="margin: 4px" src="http://profile.ak.facebook.com/object3/148/45/n82663247971_149.jpg" alt="" width="135" height="203" />He writes page turners to sell his &#8220;theology&#8221;. It&#8217;s not a big surprise to faithful and well-formed Christians&#8211;and in particular, Catholic Christians&#8211;but it seems to be news to the millions who read and love him into theological and historical delusion.</p>
<p><a title="Watch out, Oprah" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/19/opinion/19douthat.html?_r=1" target="_self">Read NY Times Op-Ed Columnist Ross Douthat here.</a> He opens up the cancerous body of work and operates from head to toe, noting that Brown isn&#8217;t just your run of the mill anti-Catholic bigot, but an avant garde DIY hater of organized religion in general:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>&#8220;Piggybacking on the fascination with <a href="http://www.randomhouse.com/catalog/display.pperl?isbn=9780375703164">lost gospels</a> and <a href="http://www.bartdehrman.com/books/lost_christianities.htm">alternative Christianities</a>, he serves up a Jesus who’s a thoroughly modern sort of messiah — sexy, worldly, and Goddess-worshiping, with a wife and kids, a house in the Galilean suburbs, and no delusions about his own divinity.</em></p>
<p><em>But the success of this message — which also shows up in the work of Brown’s many <a href="http://www.raymondkhoury.com/home/index.asp">thriller-writing</a> <a href="http://www.theexpectedone.com/">imitators</a> — can’t be separated from its dishonesty.&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s right folks. Douthat&#8217;s calling him a liar. In the NY Times. Sweet.</p>
<p>As a side note, I went to <a title="Theology on Tap in Madison, WI" href="http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/event.php?eid=82663247971&amp;ref=ts" target="_self">this Theology on Tap</a> last week that, contrary to its description, was a thorough treatment of the book and movie, &#8220;Angels and Demons,&#8221; along with a fantastic overview of the Church&#8217;s teaching on art and film. Dr. Daniel VanSlyke, Associate Professor of Church History at Kenrick-Glennon Seminary in St. Louis, was great, if not an eensy weensy bit long-winded. I&#8217;ll post the audio when I get it.</p>
<blockquote>
<blockquote>
<blockquote>
<blockquote>
<blockquote></blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ruah.stblogs.com/2009/05/31/the-gospel-according-to-dan-brown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Ornithology of Art</title>
		<link>http://ruah.stblogs.com/2008/11/11/an-ornithology-of-art/</link>
		<comments>http://ruah.stblogs.com/2008/11/11/an-ornithology-of-art/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 03:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ruah</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ecclesia de Creativity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liturgy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Faith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ornithology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ruah.stblogs.com/?p=149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
My friend, Matthew Milliner, wrote some time earlier this year a succinct summary of everything I believe about contemporary art, namely that contemporary art is corrupt, is based on poorly formed principles (if any) sans the transcendant, and needs very much the simple, faithful return to classical foundations in a truly creative way that is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://mw1.m-w.com/art/dict/swallow.gif" alt="Swallow" width="150" height="150" /><br />
My friend, <a title="Millinerd Profile" href="http://www.blogger.com/profile/1039459">Matthew Milliner</a>, wrote some time earlier this year a succinct summary of everything I believe about contemporary art, namely that contemporary art is corrupt, is based on poorly formed principles (if any) sans the transcendant, and needs very much the simple, faithful return to classical foundations in a truly creative way that is based in, above all things, the sacred Liturgy, whether directly in the liturgical arts or flowing from the altar itself by grace. His very direct and lovely way of communicating this comes down to two bird analogies: the swallows of Capistrano (as taken from Jody Bottum&#8217;s article in First Things) and the sparrows whose littleness trumps the eagles of the art world (as taught by John Walford of Wheaton College).</p>
<p><a title="When Eagles Don't Fit in Capistrano" href="http://www.dappledthings.org/east08/feature01.php">Do read the article.</a> It&#8217;s not a sound bite, hyper-summarized, bite size chunk of cultural niceties and theoretic sentamentalism, so don&#8217;t expect something that the average Facebook user would read and dig. It&#8217;s probably not something your average artsy fartsy person would dig either. Average, I said. It&#8217;s edgy, and a little (wee) bit long, but it&#8217;s worth the perseverance. So read it. It might offend you, and that&#8217;s okay I say. Truth offends. If we had more people willing to offend the Church we&#8217;d be in a much different place in respect to many things today.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Favorite quotes:</strong><br />
&#8220;A nearly universal response to contemporary art today&#8211;one that impressively transverses race, creed age, or class&#8211;is &#8216;What?&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;The decades to follow gave us conceptual art, landscape art, performance art, outsider&#8217;s art, found art, and (most revealingly perhaps) auto-destructive art.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;The cult of celebrity&#8211;with its exorbitant votive prices&#8211;drives the art world today, leaving envy and resentment in its wake: a convocation of belligerent eagles.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;We are waiting not for a Godot, but for another&#8211;doubtless very different&#8211;St. Benedict.&#8221; And lo, our Benedict has come.&#8221; [Props to Matt for the B16 reference--check his flickr account for his pics from the April Pope visit]</p>
<p> </p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ruah.stblogs.com/2008/11/11/an-ornithology-of-art/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
